# Two assistant roles: recorded demonstration

The Museum/Garden/Ferry prices are fictional inputs. The two model calls and outputs are real, recorded on September 18, 2026 (Pacific time). Both used openai/gpt-4o-mini through Vaaya's openrouter/chat action, in separate contexts. An orchestrator passed the first response into the second request. No tools, bookings, emails or purchases were enabled in either role. This is not an A2A protocol implementation or an Instinct chat capture.

`requests.json` contains the exact requests. `responses.json` preserves both assistant messages verbatim, along with selected provenance and observed charges. Account information and balances are omitted. The planner call charged 1 cent and the reviewer call charged 0 cents in the returned Vaaya receipts; those observations are not a future price quote.

The reviewer says `revise`, although its explanation says the plan is acceptable. That contradiction is deliberately preserved. The checker does not interpret the explanation: it independently recalculates the fictional prices and requires an explicit `accept` verdict, so the result is `needs_review`.

Save the script and responses in one directory, then run:

```sh
python3 check-handoff.py
```

The output is saved as `check-result.json`. Replaying the checker is deterministic and free; rerunning model requests incurs fresh charges and may produce different text. This small checker covers only this fixture, not arbitrary agent messages or a production authorization system.